the chief wrote:Latest news, and, of course, this isn't "official", that is it hasn't appeared in any of the papers, you know, like the one where the guy's being specifically labeled as having commited an act for which he has yet to be tried, but latest news is they're taking forever to go to trial because the already circumstantial evidence is so weak, no Prosecutor will touch the case, it being pretty apparent it'll get thrown out the first day.
A forensic expert has identified numerous places where the security cam tapes from the KTV were clearly tampered with, and not very skillfully, either.
Upon cursory examination, none of the KTV employee's stories matched, and were consistently contradicted by their cell phone records.
The driver kid's deposition was wildly inconsistent and apparently collapsed upon even basic follow up questioning.
More than 5 Prosecutors have passed on going to trial, and it's apparently been hot-potatoed down to like the most junior staff, like under-30s, and they don't even want it.
As always, not stating guilt or otherwise, but there cetainly isn't, as some of us discussed previously, anything even remotely like a case here.
As for dozing through the incident, I think ZD indicated that the kid pretty much had to shake him awake upon arriving near his home.
Ive been following this thread, but refrained from posting. If there is any substance to the above the police in my opinion should start an independent inquiry.
It should have been trivial for the prosecutors to prove their case, take video from the club and correlate it with credit card transactions of patrons would have seemed one way to establish time authenticity.
An inability to prove the case speaks volumes, proof of tampering with evidence is deserving of an independent review.

















